Third-party risk
beyond the questionnaire
Third-party risk is the exposure a company takes on through its vendors, suppliers, distributors, partners and their own subcontractors: financial fragility, operational dependence, reputational and integrity problems, sanctions and regulatory exposure, and concentration. Theory Intelligence assesses it with verified interviews with people who have dealt with the third party, checked public and registry records, and a signed report on what the questionnaire did not show.
- Signal Brief: one third party, 6 to 8 verified sources plus record checks, 10 business days, USD 7,500 to 12,000
- Decision Study: a critical supplier, partner or a tier of the supply chain, 15 to 30 sources, 4 to 6 weeks, USD 25,000 to 75,000
- Ongoing monitoring of critical third parties through the Intelligence Retainer
- Sources: former employees, other customers, distributors, subcontractors and industry specialists, all verified
- Record checks: registries, filings, litigation, sanctions and enforcement lists, adverse media
What the questionnaire misses
Most third-party risk programmes rest on a self-assessment questionnaire, a credit score and a sanctions screen. All three are worth having, and all three are answered by the third party or by an algorithm. None of them tells you that the supplier lost its two best engineers last quarter, that other customers are quietly dual-sourcing, that the distributor's principal is in a dispute with a former partner, or that the subcontractor two tiers down is the one that actually makes the part.
That information exists. It sits with the third party's other customers, its former employees, its competitors and the people who service its industry. Theory finds those people, verifies who they are, and asks.
What we assess
Financial fragility: whether the third party can survive a lost customer, a price shock or a delayed payment, judged from filings, credit behaviour and what its own suppliers and customers say. Operational dependence: how much of your process runs through it, what its own dependencies are, and what its real capacity and recovery position look like. Reputational and integrity exposure: the record of the company and its principals in litigation, enforcement, sanctions and press, and what counterparties say about how it behaves under pressure. Regulatory exposure: whether its practices, ownership or locations create obligations or restrictions for you. Concentration: how many of your critical inputs converge on the same few companies, sites or jurisdictions.
Deliverables
For one third party, a Signal Brief: record checks, six to eight verified interviews with people who have dealt with the company, a signed two-page assessment and a provenance appendix. For a critical supplier or partner, or a tier of a supply chain, a Decision Study: fifteen to thirty interviews, a full written assessment ranked by exposure, recommended controls and alternatives, and a working session with procurement, risk or the deal team. For the handful of third parties your business cannot run without, an Intelligence Retainer keeps them under watch and reports monthly.
Who commissions this
Procurement and supply chain leaders before a sole-source award or a long contract. Risk and compliance functions that need more than a screen for a high-exposure relationship. Investors doing due diligence on a target whose value depends on a few suppliers or channel partners. Companies entering a new country through a local distributor or agent, where the work overlaps with geopolitical risk.
All work is delivered under The Theory Standard. See services and prices.
Questions about third-party risk
Do you contact the third party itself?
Only if you want us to and only in a way you approve. Most of the work is done with people around the third party and with the public record, so it does not disturb the relationship.
Can you cover subcontractors and the second tier?
Yes, within a Decision Study. Mapping who actually makes or delivers what is often the most useful part of the work, and it is where questionnaires stop.
How does this fit with our existing screening tools?
It sits on top of them. We use the screen as a starting point and concentrate the verified interviews on the relationships where the exposure is large and the screen is silent.
Need this answered?
Write to info@theoryintel.com with the decision. A researcher replies within one business day with a fixed price and a start date.
Start a brief